Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Government 2.0

There is no question that technology has changed how Government is done. With the integration of social networking, blogs, RSS feeds, and wikis, Government is better able to serve individuals, businesses and employees alike.

Here is a forum to share your experience with technology use in Government.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RAM  
#1 Posted : Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:54:18 PM(UTC)
roaringtiger

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/9/2010(UTC)
Posts: 682

The House on Thursday sent President Obama a bill to boost telework at federal agencies, over objections by Republicans who said the measure would grant civil servants another costly fringe benefit and add layers of bureaucracy at a time when Americans want a smaller government.

Members voted 254-152 to pass the 2010 Telework Enhancement Act (H.R. 1722), which requires agencies to determine which employees are eligible to work outside the office, to establish policies allowing them to do so and to inform them of the option. The measure also requires agencies to designate an official to oversee their telework program and to incorporate the alternative work arrangement in continuity of operations planning for natural disasters and other emergencies.

During debate on the House floor, the bill's sponsors touted it as a common-sense measure that will save money down the road by reducing agencies' overhead costs, cutting energy consumption and improving productivity. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that implementing the bill will cost about $30 million over five years. But Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., said the long-term savings will provide an "excellent return" on this initial investment. He noted private sector companies such as IBM have saved as much as $56 million annually in reduced office space by allowing employees to telework. Supporters also emphasized telework is instrumental in keeping government running during emergencies and natural disasters such as the snowstorms that crippled Washington last winter.

"Passage of this telework bill is critical to ensuring that the essential services provided to Americans are not interrupted during times of emergencies, or extremely adverse weather conditions," Sue Webster, national president of Federally Employed Women, said in a statement praising lawmakers for sending the legislation to Obama. "We ... ask that the president sign it as soon as possible."

But some Republicans said the bill's potential price tag is too high, given the current economic climate and Congress' mandate -- driven home by the Nov. 2 midterm election results -- to decrease spending and cut government. Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., argued federal employees already are teleworking and don't need extra help. With unemployment topping 9 percent, it is a "travesty" that Democrats are "pushing this initiative to make it easier for federal employees -- who already have it much easier than the rest of the country -- to avoid the office," she said.

Republicans also expressed anger that the Senate had stripped out some of the oversight provisions built into the version of the bill the House passed in July. The final bill no longer requires agencies to certify that their telework programs will save money, for instance, though backers noted it does ask the Government Accountability Office and Office of Personnel Management to evaluate telework progress periodically.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, pledged to work during the next Congress to reinstate some of the safeguards the House approved in the July version. He noted he supports telework to make government more efficient but believes the bill in its current form creates bureaucracy without protections against abuse. Issa is likely to chair the oversight committee when Republicans take control of the House in January.

 
 
I can't believe the fact that most Federal Employees vote Republican when they are being constantly demonized and scapegoated by the GOP to deflect attention away from greedy CEOs and Wall Street crooks.  Maybe most feds really are tools as described in popular media (and as evidenced by people the likes of Kathi52).
jhxetc  
#2 Posted : Friday, November 19, 2010 12:06:06 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/26/2010(UTC)
Posts: 799

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
General Chat forum... In the News forum...

Use them.

Fed2Be81  
#3 Posted : Friday, November 19, 2010 12:36:59 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 272

Just like the far-Right agenda is trying to shut down the TSO officer positions, and obstruct the federal hiring process. Notice how Faux news is trying to make such a big deal out of nothing. All in the name of obstructing federal hiring.   
RAM  
#4 Posted : Friday, November 19, 2010 12:38:18 AM(UTC)
roaringtiger

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/9/2010(UTC)
Posts: 682

jhxetc wrote:
General Chat forum... In the News forum...

Use them.
 
This affects new hires so it is appropriate in this section.
 
 
[admin:  this topic has been move the Information Technology category.  This is more to Government 2.0.]
Admin2010-11-19 12:25:35
Identity-H  
#5 Posted : Sunday, December 5, 2010 7:11:28 AM(UTC)

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/5/2010(UTC)
Posts: 10

Article wrote:
costly fringe benefit
They're wrong again... as usual.
This bill will actually SAVE them money, particularly when you factor in mileage reimbursement and per diems.
 
I never minded travel, but then again I only wound up traveling a couple times and I'm a single guy.
 
Article wrote:
add layers of bureaucracy at a time when Americans want a smaller government.
That's just a talking point. Average Americans don't obsess over the "size of government". They may have their own preconceptions on whether or not it's spending tax money wisely, but the average American doesn't complain about how many cabinet departments there are. The people who are always complaining about that are usually conservative activists or repeating something they heard on Limbaugh.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


This page was generated in 0.140 seconds.