Yes, for about 2 years and counting!
My EEOC process was bogus! I did everything I have provided in my TIPS, but the AJ and agency did not comply with MD-110 requirements. Now I am waiting on OFO appeal to respond. Like I said, I did not have discovery. If I did not do all that I have suggested (you all do) in my tips relating to the ROI, they would have said….”you could have done x,y,z, but you chose not to.” I know this because I have read a variety of EEOC appeals on ROI’s and other issues.
There was just a complete disregard for MD-110 “REQUIREMENTS” because I was pro-se. I am thinking this AJ thought I was not too smart based on a few lies said by the agency about me. Well, I was smart enough to record certain things to CYA b/c I knew I was not getting a fair shake at this EEOC process.
Anyway, based on how I handled my case and subsequent appeal, that should be enough evidence to at least warrant a thorough, factual, and impartial investigation b/c I did not have one. Actually, the way I handled my case should also be included as proof of pretext based on how my agency described me.
I believe even with all their lies, conflicting stories (that should have led to credibility concerns), and no discovery, I provided enough for a truly impartial person to rule in my favor. This is why I am HOLDING ONTO FAITH and HOPE! The bias was very obvious based on how my case was handled and a few other things. This was too egregious to just be overlooked. I should be a part of the 2% because I earned it throughout this entire process. Especially, had this process been a truly impartial one. Now let’s see if impartiality will come into effect in the OFO phase. Sorry if I sound arrogant and or crazy, but please believe me, I was up against a lot, presented the best case/rebuttal given ALL my constraints, and handled it extremely well with minimal help.
Again, I am praying on it, because it was so egregious!
Edited by user Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:55:29 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified