Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

General Conversations


Within this forum, you can:

  • share experiences as a federal employee
  • ask for some general help from fellow federal employees
  • offer helpful advice
  • make this world a better place (doesn't hurt to try)

Please keep in mind that this is not an opportunity to "step up on a soap box." Let's keep things clean, polite and useful. Thanks for your cooperation.

To read today's top news stories on federal employee pay, benefits, retirement, job rights and other workplace issues visit FederalDaily.com

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
GWPDA  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:12:13 AM(UTC)
GWPDA

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/26/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2,084

Thanks: 202 times
Was thanked: 429 time(s) in 359 post(s)
From the WaPo, 10/23/2018:
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals has long filled a nonpartisan role in the federal government, run by dozens of judges charged with sorting through a thicket of regulations to determine whether an injured veteran is entitled to lifetime benefits.

But this summer, the White House rejected half of the candidates selected by the board chairwoman to serve as administrative judges, who make rulings on the disability claims. The rejections came after the White House required them to disclose their party affiliation and other details of their political leanings, according to documents viewed by The Washington Post.

Such questions had not been asked of judge candidates in the past, according to former judges and board staff.

As part of the process, the candidates were asked to provide links to their social media profiles and disclose whether they had ever given a speech to Congress, spoken at a political convention, appeared on talk radio, or published an opinion piece in a conservative forum such as Breitbart News or a liberal one such as Mother Jones, according to one candidate, who requested anonymity because the person is not authorized to speak to the media.

The rejected applicants are three Democrats and an independent. Of the four accepted by the White House and sworn in last week, three are Republicans, and one has no party affiliation but has voted in GOP primaries, according to documents and interviews.

The rebuffed candidates were not given a reason. But their rejection has raised alarms among former and current officials at the Department of Veterans Affairs, where the appeals board — with about 90 judges and 800 attorneys — has always been viewed as nonpolitical.

A logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)

“During my tenure, the White House approval was considered pro forma,” said Anthony Principi, who led the agency during George W. Bush’s first term.

“I certainly remember the chairman [of the appeals board] being political,” Principi said, “but the judges were career civil servants. They’re adjudicators.”
Frogger  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2018 3:35:39 PM(UTC)
Frogger

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/1/2017(UTC)
Posts: 348
United States
Location: Ohio

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 108 time(s) in 90 post(s)
That is disturbing.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


This page was generated in 0.043 seconds.