Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

36 Pages«<343536
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
iconism  
#701 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2020 7:26:28 AM(UTC)
iconism

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/15/2019(UTC)
Posts: 3

Thanks: 2 times
Originally Posted by: Alkaline19200 Go to Quoted Post
has anyone been told that he/she didnt fail or pass the poly ? after poly that i was told. i am not sure what is next now :(


I had a recent poly (my second). They only ran one chart. They said I was unsuccessful but I wasn't immediately offered a new slot like I was after I failed the first one. We also discussed adjudication before I left the poly room, so I don't know what my next step is either.
buckaneers  
#702 Posted : Sunday, February 2, 2020 12:00:13 PM(UTC)
buckaneers

Rank: Advisor

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/4/2017(UTC)
Posts: 108
United States
Location: Florida

Was thanked: 266 time(s) in 195 post(s)
Originally Posted by: George Maschke Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: buckaneers Go to Quoted Post
One doesn't really pass or fail a poly, it's a tool that measures physiological responses to questions and supplements personnel security and investigations.


Actually, one does really pass or fail a polygraph. If you fail, you get blackballed. In polygraph screening, the failing score is called "SR" for "significant reaction." In criminal investigations, it's called "DI" for "deception indicated." But whatever buzzword the federal polygraph community chooses to attach to it, it's still tantamount to "failing."


My understanding is that such a reading is a basis for follow-on actions (i.e. interrogations, futher inquiries, etc.) but won't lead to "failure" in of itself, at least if you're already employed there. There's a reason why it's banned from use in court and the private sector - it can't read minds. The instrument's strength comes from the fact that people believe it to be a magical lie detector when it's really more useful to screen out suspect newcomers and elicit voluntary confessions. Check out James Olson's book, "To Catch a Spy." It goes more into detail about the fallacies of "passing/failing" a polygraph.
someoldguy  
#703 Posted : Sunday, February 2, 2020 3:33:48 PM(UTC)
someoldguy

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/28/2013(UTC)
Posts: 4,101

Thanks: 299 times
Was thanked: 924 time(s) in 776 post(s)
Guy told me an interesting story... he was already cleared and working as a contractor and had to take a poly for a periodic update kind of thing. Anyway, he went, took the poly, everything seemed to be fine and he went back to work, happy that the whole thing was behind him.

But a year or so later, they put him in for some special access requiring a recent poly. He thought he was good until security told him that in fact he did not "pass" the latest poly.
DISCLAIMER: You read it on an open internet forum :)
George Maschke  
#704 Posted : Thursday, February 6, 2020 1:17:31 AM(UTC)
George Maschke

Rank: Groupie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/30/2010(UTC)
Posts: 111

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Originally Posted by: buckaneers Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: George Maschke Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: buckaneers Go to Quoted Post
One doesn't really pass or fail a poly, it's a tool that measures physiological responses to questions and supplements personnel security and investigations.


Actually, one does really pass or fail a polygraph. If you fail, you get blackballed. In polygraph screening, the failing score is called "SR" for "significant reaction." In criminal investigations, it's called "DI" for "deception indicated." But whatever buzzword the federal polygraph community chooses to attach to it, it's still tantamount to "failing."


My understanding is that such a reading is a basis for follow-on actions (i.e. interrogations, futher inquiries, etc.) but won't lead to "failure" in of itself, at least if you're already employed there. There's a reason why it's banned from use in court and the private sector - it can't read minds. The instrument's strength comes from the fact that people believe it to be a magical lie detector when it's really more useful to screen out suspect newcomers and elicit voluntary confessions. Check out James Olson's book, "To Catch a Spy." It goes more into detail about the fallacies of "passing/failing" a polygraph.


Where in To Catch a Spy does Olson discuss any "fallacies" of passing or failing a polygraph? I can't find it. On the contrary, I note that he makes specific mention of various individuals "passing" or "failing" polygraphs:

  • Jonathan Pollard was hired by US Navy intelligence and given a top-secret security clearance despite a failed CIA polygraph...
  • Is it possible to beat the polygraph? Yes, of course. Aldrich Ames "passed" a reinvestigation polygraph even though he had been working for the Russian KGB and SVR for several years....
  • Larry Wu-Tai Chin likewise passed CIA polygraphs during his thirty-plus-year espionage career...
  • Shriver failed the CIA polygraph...
  • We know that Montes was trained in counterpolygraph measures by her Cuban handlers, and she passed a DIA reinvestigation polygraph in 1994.
  • Somehow Eddie [Howard] passed the polygraph.
  • Signal/WhatsApp/Snapchat/Telegram/iMessage: +1-202-810-2105
    NoStringsAttached  
    #705 Posted : Thursday, February 6, 2020 5:03:16 AM(UTC)
    NoStringsAttached

    Rank: Rookie

    Groups: Registered
    Joined: 7/8/2019(UTC)
    Posts: 35

    Thanks: 14 times
    Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 7 post(s)
    Originally Posted by: George Maschke Go to Quoted Post



  • Nobody cares what you say George, we'd appreciate it if you were not on the NSA section of the forums. Regardless if what you say is true or false, it does not help anyone with their process. On top of that, I would go as far as saying it only hurts people's chance of getting through if they were to read all the things you keep saying. Plus, this is the 2019 thread anyway... Which should be dead to begin with.

    Again, please just get off the NSA section and go bother people elsewhere
    thanks 2 users thanked NoStringsAttached for this useful post.
    GobblyGoops on 2/6/2020(UTC), BatDog123 on 2/6/2020(UTC)
    Rss Feed  Atom Feed
    Users browsing this topic
    Guest (3)
    36 Pages«<343536
    Forum Jump  
    You cannot post new topics in this forum.
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
    You cannot create polls in this forum.
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


    This page was generated in 0.395 seconds.