Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Postal Employees

Post your thoughts and opinions here about current Postal employee topics.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
EagleDog  
#1 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:44:36 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/5/2009(UTC)
Posts: 557

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 75 time(s) in 59 post(s)
The new phone book's here! The new phone book's here!

Even better, the LONG overdue USPS Ten-Year Strategic Plan is here!!!

Errr...make that Five-Year Strategic Plan.

What a joke.


https://about.usps.com/s...tegic-plan-2020-2024.pdf
thanks 1 user thanked for this useful post.
vHatch on 1/16/2020(UTC)
stillstuckhere  
#2 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2020 8:24:08 PM(UTC)
stillstuckhere

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/25/2013(UTC)
Posts: 784

Thanks: 452 times
Was thanked: 246 time(s) in 180 post(s)
Originally Posted by: EagleDog Go to Quoted Post
The new phone book's here! The new phone book's here!

Even better, the LONG overdue USPS Ten-Year Strategic Plan is here!!!

Errr...make that Five-Year Strategic Plan.

What a joke.


https://about.usps.com/s...tegic-plan-2020-2024.pdf


Personally, a boring read. So repetitive, and the PFP(pay for performance) for "employees", not clarified till the end stating the program is for EAS(sups, postmasters, district and HQ,etc).

However, one link in that read(at the end) was more informational(IMO, both are 44pgs.). United States Postal Service 2019 Annual Report to Congress https://about.usps.com/what/fina...nnual-reports/fy2019.pdf Much better, I felt in having the past 3 year comparison charts(revenue, costs, employee numbers by craft, numbers of offices, number of delivery points total/number of routes, numbers of vehicles by type,etc). Of particular interest was number of full time/part time employees in individual crafts(for 2019).
City carriers(FT)166,343/42,121(CCA)
Clerks(FT,including nurses)121,573/26,251(PSE)
Mail Handler(FT)36,939/6,369(Mail Handler assistant)
Rural delivery carriers (FT)73,165)/58,224(Rural part-time)
Human thought is so primitive it's looked upon as an infectious disease in some of the better galaxies. That kind of makes you proud, doesn't it? huh?---MIB
vHatch  
#3 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:01:42 PM(UTC)
vHatch

Rank: Advisor

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/24/2013(UTC)
Posts: 151

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 33 time(s) in 23 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stillstuckhere Go to Quoted Post

City carriers(FT)166,343/42,121(CCA)


Isn't that way more CCAs per FT carrier than permitted in the contract?
Roger.D  
#4 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:14:45 PM(UTC)
Roger.D

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/25/2016(UTC)
Posts: 3,744
United States
Location: Midwest

Thanks: 155 times
Was thanked: 842 time(s) in 661 post(s)
Originally Posted by: vHatch Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: stillstuckhere Go to Quoted Post

City carriers(FT)166,343/42,121(CCA)


Isn't that way more CCAs per FT carrier than permitted in the contract?


What is the number listed in the contract?

ETA: no help from the audience. Let's let vHatch answer this one.

Edited by user Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:17:28 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

stillstuckhere  
#5 Posted : Friday, January 17, 2020 9:51:17 AM(UTC)
stillstuckhere

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/25/2013(UTC)
Posts: 784

Thanks: 452 times
Was thanked: 246 time(s) in 180 post(s)
https://about.usps.com/...nnual-reports/fy2019.pdf Oops forgot, pg 21 shows bonus(other pay) for HQ for 2018. PMG Brennan got just under 81K. How much we losing in money every year? Didn't the sups just recently "sue" the USPS over unfair PFP numbers?
Human thought is so primitive it's looked upon as an infectious disease in some of the better galaxies. That kind of makes you proud, doesn't it? huh?---MIB
EagleDog  
#6 Posted : Friday, January 17, 2020 10:37:54 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/5/2009(UTC)
Posts: 557

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 75 time(s) in 59 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stillstuckhere Go to Quoted Post
Personally, a boring read. So repetitive


Agreed.
Crammed full of trendy buzz words (brand, evolve, metrics, value-added, dynamic, seamless, adapt, streamline, leverage, etc.).
Short on substance.
Long on "cutting edge" business jargon.

EagleDog  
#7 Posted : Friday, January 17, 2020 11:08:56 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/5/2009(UTC)
Posts: 557

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 75 time(s) in 59 post(s)
Originally Posted by: stillstuckhere Go to Quoted Post
However, one link in that read (at the end)


As is often the case, you have to be a detective to find the "good stuff" in these reports.

Like how I discovered the $233K mail handler, buried deep inside an obscure OIG report on
management bonuses & compensation.

Columbo has nothing on me :)

vHatch  
#8 Posted : Sunday, January 19, 2020 6:59:15 AM(UTC)
vHatch

Rank: Advisor

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/24/2013(UTC)
Posts: 151

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 33 time(s) in 23 post(s)
Originally Posted by: roger.d Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: vHatch Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: stillstuckhere Go to Quoted Post

City carriers(FT)166,343/42,121(CCA)


Isn't that way more CCAs per FT carrier than permitted in the contract?


What is the number listed in the contract?

ETA: no help from the audience. Let's let vHatch answer this one.


Gonna make me look it up again eh? Do you know or just testing? Fine. Unless there is a provision in unaware of - the contract stipulates a maximum number of 15% of the amount of FTE carriers per district plus another possible 8,000.

Doing the math with 166,343 FT carriers that comes out to a maximum allowed of 32,952 CCAs.

I'm unsure if CCAs quiting or getting converted midyear accounts for the discrepancy.
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


This page was generated in 0.312 seconds.